PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
2.67%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
4.38%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
4.38%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-63.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-63.64%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-63.20%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.56%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-51.01%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-15.63%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-565.57%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-42.08%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.08%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 179.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-42.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 155.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-33.38%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 172.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-33.38%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
75.99%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
75.99%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
75.99%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to OBE's 80.23%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
59.61%
Inventory growth of 59.61% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.67%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.99%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
13.61%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.69%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.