PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.26%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.26%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-31.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-31.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.31%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-8.55%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.48%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-59.62%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-29.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-205.96%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
15.97%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
15.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 179.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
15.97%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
13.97%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 184.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.97%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
13.97%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
185.59%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 155.92%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
185.59%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to OBE's 172.18%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
185.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
78.30%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
78.30%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
78.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to OBE's 80.23%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-62.10%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-62.10%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-62.10%
Negative near-term dividend growth while OBE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
42.71%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-25.88%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.91%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.99%
50-75% of OBE's 3.41%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
20.51%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.01%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.