PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.59%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
14.76%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.69%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.69%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-13.75%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.92%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-12.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 5.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-24.01%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-24.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
31.72%
Dividend growth of 31.72% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-45.29%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-407.69%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 147.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
54.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
54.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 179.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
54.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
75.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 184.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
75.24%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
75.24%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-16.69%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 155.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-16.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 172.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-16.69%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
33.77%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
33.77%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
33.77%
Below 50% of OBE's 80.23%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
24.75%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
24.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
24.75%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 24.75% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
13.47%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
99.73%
Inventory growth of 99.73% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
16.86%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
32.04%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 3.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
49.83%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.47%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.