PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
54.43%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.28%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
492.56%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
492.56%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
557.39%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
411.11%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.76%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
423.22%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
26.55%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
25.33%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-18.60%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.05%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
517.03%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 147.32%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
89.23%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
89.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 179.84%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
89.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
116.56%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 184.32%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
116.56%
Below 50% of OBE's 2764.68%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
116.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2174.66%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 155.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2174.66%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 172.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2174.66%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
147.31%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
147.31%
Below 50% of OBE's 344.68%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
147.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 80.23%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
108.99%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
108.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
108.99%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 108.99% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-8.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-26.64%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.30%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-6.34%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.55%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-320.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.