PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.74%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.35%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
1.92%
EBIT growth below 50% of OBE's 44.80%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
1.92%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of OBE's 2.55%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
790.82%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 15.08%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
669.68%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 15.06%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
695.33%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 16.87%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
16.06%
Slight or no buybacks while OBE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
13.32%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-13.05%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 13.36%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
185.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 36.13%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
359.97%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 304.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
96.87%
10Y CAGR of 96.87% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
96.87%
5Y CAGR of 96.87% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
133.35%
3Y CAGR of 133.35% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
582.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 582.93% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
582.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 582.93% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
739.11%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 739.11% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
2356.55%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 2356.55% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
2356.55%
Net income/share CAGR of 2356.55% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
1208.71%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 1208.71% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
225.79%
Equity/share CAGR of 225.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
225.79%
Equity/share CAGR of 225.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
178.43%
Equity/share CAGR of 178.43% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
242.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 242.32% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
242.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 242.32% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
226.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 226.57% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-34.82%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-84.84%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.50%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.02%
Under 50% of OBE's 5.27%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-19.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.02%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 48.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.