PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
104.36%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
79.08%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
79.08%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-37.63%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-26.99%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-28.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.33%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.66%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 2.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.21%
Dividend growth under 50% of OBE's 8.53%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-32.85%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-69.47%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
478.08%
10Y CAGR of 478.08% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
478.08%
5Y CAGR of 478.08% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
135.70%
3Y CAGR of 135.70% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
1624.12%
OCF/share CAGR of 1624.12% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1624.12%
OCF/share CAGR of 1624.12% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
153.74%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 153.74% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
1366.29%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 1366.29% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
1366.29%
Net income/share CAGR of 1366.29% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
149.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 149.45% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
431.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.55% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
431.55%
Equity/share CAGR of 431.55% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
132.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 132.09% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
230.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 230.26% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
230.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 230.26% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
177.01%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 177.01% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-15.21%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-12.48%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.80%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
4.11%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.91%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 12.62%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
276.65%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.