PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-15.05%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-50.68%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-50.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-51.59%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-56.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-55.93%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
11.56%
Share change of 11.56% while OBE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
9.59%
Slight or no buyback while OBE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-12.92%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 11.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
2.05%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
163.87%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
157.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
157.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
122.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
270.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
270.05%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
224.70%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
650.34%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
650.34%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
162.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
290.52%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 64.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
290.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 64.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
119.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 64.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
355.76%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 15.58%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
355.76%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 15.58%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
1102.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 15.58%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
17.20%
AR growth well above OBE's 13.66%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
15.68%
Inventory growth of 15.68% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-0.31%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-15.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
9.64%
Debt growth far above OBE's 11.51%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
55.06%
SG&A growth well above OBE's 9.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.