Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.

EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 21.46%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.

Operating income growth above 1.5x OBE's 21.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while OBE is at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.64%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

OCF/share CAGR of 442.12% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.

OCF/share CAGR of 442.12% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.

3Y OCF/share CAGR of 209.37% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.

Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 59.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 59.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 59.93%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.

Dividend/share CAGR of 365.25% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 365.25% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 272.94% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Asset growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 3.63%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.

Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

Debt shrinking faster vs. OBE's 29.97%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.