PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.20%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 82.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
38.86%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 93.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
90.15%
EBIT growth 50-75% of OBE's 143.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
90.15%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of OBE's 143.69%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-91.39%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-91.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-91.71%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.13%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 50.43%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.61%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 51.14%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
94.37%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 17.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
93.40%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 360.87%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
922.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 25.36%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
317.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 25.36%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
148.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 25.36%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1593.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
149.24%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
28.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
18.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-79.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
389.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
716.56%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 68.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
256.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 68.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
105.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 68.47%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
1886.90%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
1566.52%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
856.44%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
22.23%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OBE's 132.79%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
21.79%
Inventory growth of 21.79% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 82.95%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-7.09%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 17.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.85%
Debt shrinking faster vs. OBE's 104.56%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.12%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 118.76%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.