Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 4.69%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 4.69%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.

Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 56.21%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 56.21%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 56.21%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.