PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-39.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-66.67%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 29.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-66.67%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 50.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-75.16%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 58.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-75.00%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 59.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 2.90%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.27%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
6.77%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 4.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
255.33%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 62.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
161.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
69.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
9.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
426.71%
OCF/share CAGR of 426.71% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
200.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 200.57% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-7.17%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-2.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
17.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-87.77%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
248.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 62.53%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
160.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 62.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
48.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
899.39%
Dividend/share CAGR of 899.39% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
701.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 701.10% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
305.19%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
6.92%
AR growth well above OBE's 0.70%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
32.46%
Inventory growth of 32.46% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.58%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.69%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-5.34%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.18%
SG&A growth of 41.18% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.