PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
411.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 16.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
109.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 36.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
390.41%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 283.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
390.41%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 279.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
134.28%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 741.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
135.22%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 735.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
131.68%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 730.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.53%
Share reduction while OBE is at 1.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.26%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.88%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-155.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-428.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
485.87%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
42.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-15.86%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-873.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-158.49%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-148.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1878.88%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
4931.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
259.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
661.15%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 39.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
91.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 39.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
926.54%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
394.15%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
16.75%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
11.27%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
25.00%
Inventory growth of 25.00% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
0.33%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.72%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.46%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.43%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.