PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-58.56%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-71.47%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 3.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-119.12%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 693.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-119.12%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-133.89%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 153.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-134.37%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 148.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-134.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 144.44%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.28%
Share reduction while OBE is at 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.55%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 3.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.06%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
215.67%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
81.87%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
4.05%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-51.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-71.32%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
144.96%
OCF/share CAGR of 144.96% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
20.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 20.20% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-54.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-309.87%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 21.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-171.02%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 21.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-138.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 158.01%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
145.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 57.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
46.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 57.00%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-0.10%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
396.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 396.94% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
162.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 162.38% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
6.81%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while OBE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
12.34%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-80.00%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-3.69%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.39%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 3.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.65%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.49%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.