PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
65.08%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
113.05%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
348.34%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
348.34%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
220.00%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
219.88%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
216.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.18%
Share reduction while OBE is at 4.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 4.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.18%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while OBE cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
48.38%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 38.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
72.42%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 40.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
5.78%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-30.01%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-56.16%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.20%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-39.36%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
141.84%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
164.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-34.35%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
379.13%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 43.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
46.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with OBE's 43.08%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
-11.52%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.41%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-0.71%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-6.37%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.34%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.58%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.15%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.71%
We cut SG&A while OBE invests at 6.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.