PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.49%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
31.21%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
134.02%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 53.57%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
134.02%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
285.71%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 1485.71%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
282.76%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 1478.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
282.76%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 1478.13%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.18%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 3.33%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.12%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-291.02%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
176.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-52.12%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-72.94%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
537.27%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-63.04%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-62.37%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
4.07%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-92.90%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-12.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 190.43%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
627.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 45.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
36.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 45.15%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
-10.95%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
917.44%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
208.07%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-48.79%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
11.12%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OBE's 30.57%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-33.33%
Inventory is declining while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 11.35%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-2.38%
We have a declining book value while OBE shows 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.11%
Debt growth far above OBE's 3.16%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.78%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 139.58%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.