PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.14%
Revenue growth under 50% of OBE's 65.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
34.16%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 143.75%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
163.86%
EBIT growth below 50% of OBE's 3307.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
163.86%
Operating income growth under 50% of OBE's 2492.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
125.64%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
126.42%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
124.53%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.13%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 6.25%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
75.96%
FCF growth 75-90% of OBE's 88.10%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
40.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-41.24%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-72.36%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
164.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 164.63% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-53.36%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-50.87%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-26.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 57.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-90.82%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-85.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 167.73%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
148.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 60.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
5.84%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-16.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
397.82%
Dividend/share CAGR of 397.82% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
101.84%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-50.10%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
3.32%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 1.05%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.44%
Under 50% of OBE's 1.63%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.89%
Debt growth far above OBE's 7.08%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.