PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.59%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.03%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-152.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-152.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-305.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-306.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-306.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.98%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 13.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-21.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
94.91%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-24.34%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-62.20%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
198.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-19.41%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-44.64%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-444.10%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-145.86%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-123.28%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
347.81%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 44.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
14.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-27.59%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
956.80%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
131.87%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-50.07%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
2.03%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OBE's 18.25%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.16%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 1.29%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-6.57%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.21%
SG&A growth well above OBE's 239.47%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.