PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-29.84%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 4.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-38.48%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 20.77%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-75.06%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 758.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-75.06%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 75.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-74.25%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 167.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-74.75%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 167.24%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-74.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 167.24%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.30%
Share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 1.16%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x OBE's 0.72%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-1.22%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
68.77%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 28.14%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
445.88%
FCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 113.79%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
4.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-86.86%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-42.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE stands at 6.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
55.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-68.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-29.63%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
12.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.62%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-69.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 200.38%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-15.29%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OBE stands at 37.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-76.73%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-68.89%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
717.34%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-63.63%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-27.41%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-14.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
107.58%
Inventory growth of 107.58% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.21%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.67%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.50%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.11%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.