PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.23%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-2.71%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-72.59%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-72.59%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 745.16%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-233.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-236.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-236.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.55%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-50.59%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 29.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-186.73%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-3.08%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-78.20%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-0.83%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
8.61%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-77.02%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-49.86%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE stands at 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-222.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-123.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-496.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-21.02%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while OBE stands at 17.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.23%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-70.38%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
637.70%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-86.79%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-73.54%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
114.38%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
81.02%
Inventory growth of 81.02% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.00%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.91%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.48%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.70%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.