PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.04%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-35.12%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 112.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-142.19%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-142.19%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-188.64%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-188.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-188.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.69%
Dividend growth of 7.69% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.99%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 55.10%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-710.53%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-78.32%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-71.35%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-50.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-87.61%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-84.62%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-62.95%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-144.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
2.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3.70%
Below 50% of OBE's 68.43%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-63.08%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-67.81%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
2.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-81.06%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-91.83%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-69.12%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-33.40%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 21.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.70%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.09%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.