PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.53%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 29.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
68.72%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 42.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
6650.00%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
6650.00%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-177.89%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-178.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-178.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
3.36%
Positive OCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-20.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-83.97%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.93%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-59.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-86.82%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-61.04%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
7.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-116.27%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-116.68%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-188.12%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 96.65%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-75.09%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-3.82%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-47.07%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-92.82%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-92.79%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-78.67%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-41.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 10.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.36%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.84%
We have some new debt while OBE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 35.71%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.