Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while OBE is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 85.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 93.03%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.