PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-48.13%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 24.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-69.85%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 93.33%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-116.77%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 57.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-116.77%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 86.06%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-123.79%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 52.21%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-118.55%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 52.56%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-118.55%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 52.56%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
28.12%
Share count expansion well above OBE's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
68.11%
Dividend growth of 68.11% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-5.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-198.57%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-83.53%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-60.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
13.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-82.25%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-65.97%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
132.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-115.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 56.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-228.12%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 45.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
55.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 46.80%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
-72.76%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
20.07%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
29.76%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-94.27%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-66.69%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
48.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 48.51% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
96.71%
AR growth well above OBE's 49.06%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.32%
Asset growth above 1.5x OBE's 1.58%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.58%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
41.28%
Debt growth far above OBE's 39.90%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
122.44%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.