PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.95%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.89%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 93.23%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-41.45%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 88.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-41.45%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 90.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-55.65%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 82.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-54.10%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 82.88%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-54.10%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 82.88%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-4.20%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.20%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-16.56%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 1166.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
21.79%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 145.45%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-72.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-54.13%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
23.99%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-84.08%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-39.15%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
163.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 132.10%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
238.41%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-97.03%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-69.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE is 88.14%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-77.43%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-41.49%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
3.28%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-95.46%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-73.64%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
19.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.77% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.75%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.80%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.40%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.