PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.88%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
144.69%
Positive gross profit growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
2810.71%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2810.71%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
7116.67%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7112.99%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7236.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.04%
Share change of 0.04% while OBE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-1.80%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-4.04%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-22.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-243.59%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-57.55%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
23.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
52.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
141.75%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-31.50%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
299.96%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-83.91%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
114.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-26.83%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-67.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-37.53%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
16.99%
Positive short-term equity growth while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-90.83%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-63.16%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
19.85%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.85% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
4.80%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.08%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.59%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2038.10%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.