PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-72.53%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-106.81%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 99.34%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-634.78%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 97.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-634.78%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 98.54%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1141.09%
Negative net income growth while OBE stands at 97.05%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-1141.36%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 97.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-1141.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 97.06%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
Dividend growth of 4.17% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-79.33%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
39.73%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 120.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-71.94%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-43.36%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-49.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-92.56%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-74.58%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is at 102.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-59.80%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-392.82%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-76.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 22.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-1091.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-80.13%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-51.35%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-35.15%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.34%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
-56.24%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
33.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.76% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.41%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.90%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-42.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
4.38%
Debt growth far above OBE's 2.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.71%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.