PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.29%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of OBE's 30.34%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
15.01%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 1473.68%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
132.99%
EBIT growth below 50% of OBE's 373.91%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
132.99%
Operating income growth under 50% of OBE's 476.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
150.33%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 7633.33%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
150.21%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 7704.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
149.15%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 7460.98%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.40%
Share change of 0.40% while OBE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 3.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
15.02%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 170.19%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
26.86%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-37.58%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
58.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
4.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-26.03%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
241.13%
Positive OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
62.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
124.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
152.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 122.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
52.87%
Below 50% of OBE's 134.69%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-86.16%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-51.37%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-54.42%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-90.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
19.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 19.56% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
19.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 19.52% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
40.60%
AR growth well above OBE's 28.43%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 1.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.31%
Similar to OBE's 7.27%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-6.78%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
318.18%
We expand SG&A while OBE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.