PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-41.09%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 31.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-74.47%
Negative gross profit growth while OBE is at 78.77%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-112.04%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-112.04%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 103.04%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-117.41%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-117.74%
Negative EPS growth while OBE is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-117.74%
Negative diluted EPS growth while OBE is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.81%
Share reduction while OBE is at 8.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.42%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 11.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
45.62%
Dividend growth of 45.62% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.43%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 33.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-26.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-37.45%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
14.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 52.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
51.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 82.69%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-36.48%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
388.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 95.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
22.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 7591.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-1248.98%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-142.27%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
6.64%
Below 50% of OBE's 128.44%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-68.37%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-45.73%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-57.09%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-79.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
162.09%
Dividend/share CAGR of 162.09% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
76.26%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 76.26% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
46.22%
AR growth well above OBE's 40.20%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.01%
Similar asset growth to OBE's 6.23%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-6.93%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 148.61%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.