PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
89.93%
Revenue growth above 1.5x OBE's 35.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
309.76%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x OBE's 76.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
971.26%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 295.77%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
971.26%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OBE's 114.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
663.07%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 562.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
661.70%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 561.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
654.26%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 542.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-0.08%
Share reduction while OBE is at 1.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above OBE's 1.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
23.17%
Dividend growth of 23.17% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
96.20%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 48.99%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
255.98%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 532.82%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
192.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
161.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 135.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
95.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 130.12%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
21.95%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
366.46%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 477.19%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
59.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 3803.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
152.43%
Positive 10Y CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
210.19%
Below 50% of OBE's 1210.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
333.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 162.49%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-51.25%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-35.07%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-37.58%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-75.07%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
245.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 245.88% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
174.91%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 174.91% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. OBE's 15.11%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 1.50%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
24.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 13.32%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-15.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.