PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
8.09%
Gross profit growth under 50% of OBE's 157.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-15.22%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 682.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.22%
Negative operating income growth while OBE is at 1337.53%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
12.56%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 1918.21%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.68%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 1915.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.47%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 1970.27%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.98%
Share reduction while OBE is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.72%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-6.54%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.04%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
14.63%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
19.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
108.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 49.94%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
115.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 68.32%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-27.39%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
86.39%
Below 50% of OBE's 1414.56%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
25.77%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 128.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1092.89%
Similar net income/share CAGR to OBE's 1069.15%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
558.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 1012.81%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
23446.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 202.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-13.60%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-10.17%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-18.75%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while OBE is at 28.09%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.01%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
205.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 205.07% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
128.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 128.06% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-9.15%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 3.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.74%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 40.90%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
19.76%
Under 50% of OBE's 66.34%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.