PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.53%
Positive revenue growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-16.61%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
80.51%
EBIT growth above 1.5x OBE's 24.64%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
80.51%
Positive operating income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
110.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x OBE's 38.31%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
112.16%
EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 41.94%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
111.56%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x OBE's 40.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.51%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-4.56%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
44.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 23.50%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
852.90%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-17.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while OBE stands at 75.39%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
75.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of OBE's 98.58%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
54.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
64.42%
Below 50% of OBE's 475.55%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
73.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 967.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
284.93%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x OBE's 104.22% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-41.80%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 128.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
232.64%
Below 50% of OBE's 10680.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
9.25%
Positive growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-2.49%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
157.13%
Below 50% of OBE's 379.69%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
8.84%
Stable or rising dividend while OBE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
321.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 321.64% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
210.30%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 210.30% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-11.98%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.44%
Asset growth well under 50% of OBE's 1.36%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
9.12%
BV/share growth above 1.5x OBE's 4.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.59%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.31%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.