PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.65%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-22.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-27.12%
Negative EBIT growth while OBE is at 156.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-27.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.59%
Net income growth under 50% of OBE's 211.76%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.40%
EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 206.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
2.42%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of OBE's 206.67%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.30%
Share reduction while OBE is at 4.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.54%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.12%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
52.98%
OCF growth above 1.5x OBE's 32.71%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
480.44%
Positive FCF growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-22.38%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
11.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 54.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
27.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 49.84%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-26.83%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
15.45%
Below 50% of OBE's 2449.43%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 70.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-30.15%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
4.99%
Below 50% of OBE's 120.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
261.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-15.54%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
7.00%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
155.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 131.21%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-12.18%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
227.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 227.32% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
207.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 207.52% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.13%
Negative asset growth while OBE invests at 3.67%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.97%
Positive BV/share change while OBE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.69%
We’re deleveraging while OBE stands at 34.82%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.44%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.