PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.97%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x OBE's 4.14%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
92.74%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of OBE's 116.52%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
9.56%
Positive EBIT growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x OBE's 5.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
49.12%
Positive net income growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.78%
Positive EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
51.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while OBE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.54%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.53%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.45%
Dividend growth of 0.45% while OBE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.38%
OCF growth under 50% of OBE's 41.59%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
22.62%
FCF growth under 50% of OBE's 137.46%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-42.48%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
25.40%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 92.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
27.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of OBE's 42.31%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-16.96%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
36.47%
Below 50% of OBE's 218.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
23.48%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 59.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-89.79%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 297.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
243.51%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 209.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
790.85%
Positive short-term CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-36.56%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
8.42%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while OBE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
175.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 125.02%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-13.51%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
228.10%
Dividend/share CAGR of 228.10% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
106.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 106.82% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.20%
Our AR growth while OBE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
257.99%
Positive asset growth while OBE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.78%
1.25-1.5x OBE's 3.62%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-3.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.49%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.