PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.85%
Negative revenue growth while OBE stands at 12.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-99.24%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-99.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-111.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-111.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-111.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.95%
Share change of 0.95% while OBE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-1.40%
Reduced diluted shares while OBE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.94%
Dividend reduction while OBE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-0.20%
Negative OCF growth while OBE is at 4.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.31%
Negative FCF growth while OBE is at 30.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.62%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
37.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 79.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-35.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while OBE stands at 30.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
118.92%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while OBE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
37.14%
Below 50% of OBE's 116.74%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
35.18%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of OBE's 73.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-116.97%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is at 85.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-881.48%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while OBE is 51.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-104.25%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-40.25%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
2.11%
Below 50% of OBE's 18.89%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
99.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x OBE's 74.46%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-12.61%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
206.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 206.22% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
112.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 112.49% while OBE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-17.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while OBE shows 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.85%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.96%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.13%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. OBE's 1200.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.