40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
47.06%
Positive revenue growth while VET is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
89.19%
Positive gross profit growth while VET is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
170.91%
Positive EBIT growth while VET is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
170.91%
Positive operating income growth while VET is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
190.99%
Positive net income growth while VET is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
190.80%
Positive EPS growth while VET is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
190.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VET is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VET's 0.17%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.40%
Dividend reduction while VET stands at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
53.13%
Positive OCF growth while VET is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
682544.15%
Positive FCF growth while VET is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
360.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VET's 930.07%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
695.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 179.55%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
204.93%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 45.64%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
398.92%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 146.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
190.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VET's 159.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
1291.45%
Below 50% of VET's 4049.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1988.69%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 445.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
1423.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 59.38%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
540.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 289.92%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
264.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 116.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
95.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 55.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2147.44%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 24.26%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
435.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x VET's 11.67%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-32.27%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.99%
Inventory is declining while VET stands at 197.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.00%
Asset growth above 1.5x VET's 0.40%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.56%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VET's 7.45%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.00%
We cut SG&A while VET invests at 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.