PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.48%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.46%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
41.97%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
41.97%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
115.34%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.82%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
37.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
58.62%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
56.84%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-55.10%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
39.67%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.12%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-15.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 20.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-15.63%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-18.61%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-18.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 25.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-18.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
87.71%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 58.99%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
87.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
87.71%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
17.01%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
17.01%
Below 50% of VTLE's 73.01%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
17.01%
Below 50% of VTLE's 38.15%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
4.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
4.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
4.83%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.83% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
9.76%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.02%
Inventory growth of 2.02% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.56%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-34.29%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.80%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.67%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VTLE's 51.85%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.