PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.73%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-44.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-44.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
56.92%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
58.82%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
55.15%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.49%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 0.49%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-3.05%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
32.55%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.57%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-14.59%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-14.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 20.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.59%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.93%
Below 50% of VTLE's 58.99%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
24.93%
Below 50% of VTLE's 67.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
24.93%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
165.80%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
165.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
165.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.60%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
28.21%
Inventory growth of 28.21% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
2.22%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.43%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.99%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
315.92%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 51.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.