Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)

Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 355.76% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1102.42% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.

Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.