PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.30%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-17.94%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-40.26%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-40.26%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
15.45%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.59%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.73%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.25%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-3.02%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-507.40%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
352.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
436.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 20.03%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
139.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
469.32%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
599.52%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
162.89%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1390.71%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 58.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
694.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 67.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-34.46%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
460.83%
Positive growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
379.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 73.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
126.78%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 38.15%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
961.77%
Dividend/share CAGR of 961.77% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
912.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 912.89% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
408.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 408.06% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.74%
Inventory growth of 6.74% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.98%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.26%
Positive BV/share change while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
31.58%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.26%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 51.85%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.