PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
65.08%
Revenue growth of 65.08% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
113.05%
Gross profit growth of 113.05% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
348.34%
EBIT growth of 348.34% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
348.34%
Operating income growth of 348.34% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
220.00%
Net income growth of 220.00% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
219.88%
EPS growth of 219.88% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
216.96%
Diluted EPS growth of 216.96% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-0.18%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.03%
Diluted share change of 0.03% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.18%
Dividend growth of 0.18% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
48.38%
OCF growth of 48.38% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
72.42%
FCF growth of 72.42% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
5.78%
10Y CAGR of 5.78% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-30.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-56.16%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 28.20% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-39.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
141.84%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 141.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
164.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 164.85% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-34.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
379.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 379.13% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
46.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 46.13% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-11.52%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 168.41% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.71%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
3.34%
Asset growth of 3.34% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
3.58%
BV/share growth of 3.58% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-2.15%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.71%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.