PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-40.99%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 41.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.48%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 41.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-125.13%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 37.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-125.13%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 37.12%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-106.93%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 110.97%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-107.07%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 110.90%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-107.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 110.90%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.64%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 100.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-83.52%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 11.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.34%
10Y CAGR of 13.34% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
-42.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-74.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
146.90%
OCF/share CAGR of 146.90% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-63.85%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-56.63%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-158.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-102.39%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-103.94%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
375.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 375.33% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
45.90%
Equity/share CAGR of 45.90% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
-15.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
956.80%
Dividend/share CAGR of 956.80% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
208.71%
Dividend/share CAGR of 208.71% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.47%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
8.11%
AR growth of 8.11% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-50.00%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.71%
Asset growth of 0.71% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-0.13%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.57%
Debt growth of 0.57% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.11%
SG&A growth well above VTLE's 7.30%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.