40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.22%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
145.91%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
94.03%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
94.03%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
16.06%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.00%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.03%
Dividend growth of 0.03% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
80.98%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
318.67%
Positive FCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-26.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 148.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-81.46%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 148.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-73.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 148.20%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
232.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VTLE's 160.72%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-47.72%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 160.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-56.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 160.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-1358.85%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-234.80%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-5178.11%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-14.95%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-71.85%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-77.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
352.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 352.84% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-0.69%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-49.99%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-63.93%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-5.80%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.25%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 4.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.35%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 4.75%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.37%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.