PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.96%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 12.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
39.42%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 9.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
855.56%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 9.14%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
855.56%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 9.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
146.22%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
147.06%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
147.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.37%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.37%
Slight or no buyback while VTLE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
30.29%
Dividend growth of 30.29% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
104.11%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 43.48%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
269.41%
FCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 6.91%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
8.50%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 43.38%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-58.41%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 43.38%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.78%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 43.38%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
5.78%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VTLE's 49.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-47.84%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 49.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
48.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to VTLE's 49.40%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-34.62%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-87.79%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
47.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-24.78%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-77.31%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-69.25%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
81.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.20% while VTLE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-82.78%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-65.53%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-19.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 4.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.60%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.58%
Negative asset growth while VTLE invests at 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.32%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VTLE's 0.05%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-10.24%
We’re deleveraging while VTLE stands at 42.79%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.91%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 9.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.