PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-33.55%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 20.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-48.52%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 317.37%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1010.00%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 55.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1010.00%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 55.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
5.68%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.01%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.01%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
11.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 29.95%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
11.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VTLE's 29.95%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-12.29%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-38.17%
Negative OCF growth while VTLE is at 225.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-75.20%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 75.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-76.02%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-50.46%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-0.62%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-64.83%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-70.74%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-58.66%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-298.53%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-179.55%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
4.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-40.28%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 149.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-59.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 149.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
0.08%
Below 50% of VTLE's 41.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-42.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-77.93%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-77.97%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-20.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 9.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.89%
We show growth while VTLE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-16.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-26.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.80%
We cut SG&A while VTLE invests at 6.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.