PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
58.07%
Positive revenue growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
163.75%
Positive gross profit growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
206.96%
Positive EBIT growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
206.96%
Positive operating income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.23%
Positive net income growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.20%
Positive EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.05%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
2.75%
Dividend growth of 2.75% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
52.01%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 27.17%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
95.51%
FCF growth similar to VTLE's 87.02%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-66.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 47.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-52.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VTLE stands at 47.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
12.06%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-61.62%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 98.82%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-70.06%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is at 98.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-65.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-573.05%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-278.61%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
13.02%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-50.44%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-66.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
6.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-39.24%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-77.36%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-77.37%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-6.13%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-69.64%
Inventory is declining while VTLE stands at 3050.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-9.18%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.01%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-1.51%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.