PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.96%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-36.13%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 130.44%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-206.50%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 62.59%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-206.50%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 62.59%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
38.07%
Net income growth under 50% of VTLE's 82.70%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
38.02%
EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 82.74%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
38.57%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of VTLE's 82.72%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.10%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.81%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-66.63%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-64.96%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-220.24%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-81.09%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-60.51%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-38.33%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-91.99%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-78.32%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-59.71%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-130.15%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-524.79%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
23.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-61.08%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-71.55%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VTLE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
1.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-76.18%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.27%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-92.33%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-36.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.82%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-10.64%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.00%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 4.28%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.85%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.