PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.04%
Negative revenue growth while VTLE stands at 15.39%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-35.12%
Negative gross profit growth while VTLE is at 37.30%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-142.19%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 78.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-142.19%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 78.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-188.64%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-188.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-188.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.69%
Dividend growth of 7.69% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
6.99%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 3.76%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-710.53%
Negative FCF growth while VTLE is at 111.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-78.32%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 13.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-71.35%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-50.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-87.61%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-84.62%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-62.95%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-144.94%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
2.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3.70%
Positive short-term CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-63.08%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-67.81%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
2.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-81.06%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-91.83%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-69.12%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-33.40%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 12.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.70%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.09%
Debt growth far above VTLE's 0.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.