PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
57.79%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 2.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
142.67%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 8.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
1020.37%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1020.37%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 12.90%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
253.38%
Net income growth comparable to VTLE's 269.10%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
234.15%
EPS growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 268.91%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
234.15%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of VTLE's 264.88%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
13.36%
Share count expansion well above VTLE's 0.19%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.36%
Diluted share count expanding well above VTLE's 2.66%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-5.49%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-46.73%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.26%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-76.60%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-45.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.79%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-94.94%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-87.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-91.44%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-20.96%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 1077.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
2617.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 112.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
182.96%
Below 50% of VTLE's 29241.93%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-64.84%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-41.72%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-5.06%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-91.06%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.28%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-77.60%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
77.76%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 2.03%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-6.04%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 39.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.27%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.