PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-25.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-35.41%
Negative EBIT growth while VTLE is at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-35.41%
Negative operating income growth while VTLE is at 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-23.20%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-22.73%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-22.73%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.67%
Dividend reduction while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
105.66%
OCF growth above 1.5x VTLE's 45.99%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
32.76%
FCF growth similar to VTLE's 30.72%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-83.97%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
12.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-48.06%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-91.64%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-73.86%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-78.35%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-80.99%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 14.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
116.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VTLE's 54.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-6.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 381.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-69.39%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-24.92%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-24.12%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-92.29%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.79%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-78.68%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
9.14%
Our AR growth while VTLE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Asset growth well under 50% of VTLE's 6.74%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.95%
Under 50% of VTLE's 27.88%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.30%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VTLE's 3.01%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.