PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
40.53%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VTLE's 16.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
68.72%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VTLE's 27.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
6650.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VTLE's 713.35%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
6650.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VTLE's 713.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-177.89%
Negative net income growth while VTLE stands at 2589.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-178.67%
Negative EPS growth while VTLE is at 2596.35%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-178.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VTLE is at 2637.31%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.04%
Share reduction while VTLE is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.04%
Dividend growth of 0.04% while VTLE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
3.36%
Positive OCF growth while VTLE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-20.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-83.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 47.78%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-42.93%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-59.10%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-86.82%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-61.04%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
7.72%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VTLE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-116.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is at 508.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-116.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VTLE is 1732.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-188.12%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VTLE is 19.98%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-75.09%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-3.82%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-47.07%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
-92.82%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-92.79%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VTLE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-78.67%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VTLE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-41.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while VTLE shows 16.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.68%
Positive asset growth while VTLE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.36%
We have a declining book value while VTLE shows 121.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.84%
We have some new debt while VTLE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
We expand SG&A while VTLE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.